Southern Miss.
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
609  Dana Dillistone SR 21:06
782  Theresa Harto FR 21:17
797  Monika Gebarzewksa FR 21:18
881  Daphney Stanford SR 21:24
1,279  Regen McGee FR 21:49
1,400  Courtney Filliben SR 21:56
1,789  Savannah McMillon FR 22:20
2,024  Victoria Hoppe SO 22:34
National Rank #147 of 344
South Region Rank #19 of 47
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 12th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.1%
Top 10 in Regional 15.7%
Top 20 in Regional 99.5%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Dana Dillistone Theresa Harto Monika Gebarzewksa Daphney Stanford Regen McGee Courtney Filliben Savannah McMillon Victoria Hoppe
Rebel Invitational 09/09 1360 22:51
LSU Invitational 09/17 1184 21:07 21:23 21:27 21:39 21:33 22:06 21:42
Alabama Crimson Classic 10/14 1133 20:59 21:05 21:02 21:29 21:47 21:33 22:10 23:11
Conference USA Championship 10/29 1177 21:12 21:19 21:24 21:13 22:06 22:04 22:23 21:49
South Region Championships 11/11 1161 20:49 21:24 21:30 21:37 21:45 22:54 23:32





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 13.3 401 0.1 0.3 0.8 1.4 4.6 8.6 10.6 14.6 14.4 13.7 11.6 7.6 5.4 3.4 1.8 1.0 0.5 0.1 0.1



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Dana Dillistone 59.4 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.3
Theresa Harto 73.5 0.1
Monika Gebarzewksa 75.1 0.1 0.1
Daphney Stanford 82.5 0.1
Regen McGee 112.1
Courtney Filliben 120.6
Savannah McMillon 148.1




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 0.1% 0.1 5
6 0.3% 0.3 6
7 0.8% 0.8 7
8 1.4% 1.4 8
9 4.6% 4.6 9
10 8.6% 8.6 10
11 10.6% 10.6 11
12 14.6% 14.6 12
13 14.4% 14.4 13
14 13.7% 13.7 14
15 11.6% 11.6 15
16 7.6% 7.6 16
17 5.4% 5.4 17
18 3.4% 3.4 18
19 1.8% 1.8 19
20 1.0% 1.0 20
21 0.5% 0.5 21
22 0.1% 0.1 22
23 0.1% 0.1 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0